Try making your own blog. For free! 30 days to try before you buy
February 2008
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
  1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29  
Jan   Mar

Site structure
Members
About us
I'm a long term family blogger. My previous blog was at cybersaps.org. The one before at steve.cybersaps.com. Which was started in 1999.

Below: an RSS feed I built, from one of my clients in Australia.
Next 7 days
Last built: 10:16AM GMT
Sep 4, 2008 (Thu).
522, Hrsikesa, Pancami

Citra
Srimati Sita Thakurani (Sri Advaita's consort)
Appearance

News Departments

Archive page for Thursday, 02 February service



 Mo, Feb 18, 2008
Diana murder & inquest farce
I believe they bumped her orf. It would only take a word from Queeny to the Greek. For him to put the plot in motion, by mentioning it to the right person. That person, someone in the 'dark forces' would put it to a controller on the ground, who would carry out the plot. A paparazzi to bribe and brief the driver to go the way they wanted and two people on a motorbike to flash him at a key time. 7 people including Queeny.

Perhaps they set up the seat belts. Perhaps they set up the CCTV and the ambulance drivers. Perhaps they set up the embalming.

Why? Perhaps it was the possibility of marriage, perhaps it was the possibility of pregnancy and a 'wog' half brother to the half brothers. Better now, in an accident than later, when she was even more popular, stepping out of the maternity ward. They had tried many times to destroy her reputation in the eyes of the great unwashed British public, the Squidgygate was one time.

I think they realised that she was too popular with the public and disenchanted Royal employees. With too much inside knowledge (remember the Royal homosexual activities between a Royal and a servant revealed by George Smith) she could bring them down. Couldn't have that!

Here's some questions asked in the Guardian comments today with some additions of mine and some of my questions at the end: Comment is free: A travesty of justice:

1. Why do we have no pictures of the moment of the crash?
There are CCTV cameras all along the Alma Tunnel, and they were all working, except for the one that would have shown how the crash happened. This one was turned to face the wall. Why?

2. Why wasn't the crash cordoned off?
Police say they did cordon off the area for four to five hours, after which they claimed they had enough evidence. So, the cleansing teams were sent in at dawn to hose down and disinfect the tunnel, eliminating the possibility of obtaining further evidence. Who ordered this?

3. Why did the ambulance take so long to get Diana to the hospital?
The ambulance that drove her from the tunnel, flanked by two police outriders, took 70 minutes to reach the Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, 6km away, normally a 10 minute journey.

4. Why was Diana embalmed?
French law clearly says that no body should be embalmed if a postmortem is required.

So why did chief pathologist Dominique Lecomte embalm her immediately? Conspiracy theorists claim that it was in order to prevent a pregnancy test.

Their argument may be nonsense, but what makes their claim stronger was that someone at the hospital did announce that night Diana was six-weeks pregnant. This report was later withdrawn.

5. Why was a dangerous car used?
The Mercedes S280 supplied to Dodi had problems. Four months earlier it had been stolen, recovered, stripped and then remade. But all was not well. Its usual driver, Olivier Lafaye, told the police it was unstable and drifted out at the rear end.

A warning light also indicated the vehicle had a brake problem. When the Gendarmerie Nationale motor unit did check the car, they found the brake fluid was 7.5 per cent water.

6.Was Henri Paul a patsy?
Paul was the security officer at the Ritz, called in by Dodi to drive the car that night. He died at the wheel, and the postmortem at the hospital found he had been drunk at the time. Authorities later blamed him for causing the accident and not the paparazzi. Case solved.

Unfortunately, the evidence does not fit the conclusions. First, Paul does not appear drunk in any of the CCTV coverage that night. He parks his car normally, he walks steadily.

The Sun: The bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones told the High Court hearing: “At no time did I perceive he had been drinking. If I had, I would have ensured he did not drive the car.” Rees-Jones is also reported by Karen McKenzie, Mohamed Al Fayed’s housekeeper, to have said to her as he was waiting for a lift. “If I remember, they’ll kill me.”

Second, Paul was not a drunk. He had a perfectly normal liver and two days earlier had passed all the tests for his pilot's licence. Even if the blood sample finding was correct, it raised a far more serious problem. It showed his blood had a high concentration of carbon dioxide, enough to give him a blinding headache and render him unable to function normally. According to established medical opinion, Paul could not have been driven with that much carbon dioxide in his blood, and the levels were not found in Diana's or Dodi's blood. If Paul was functioning normally at the Ritz, but full of alcohol and carbon dioxide at the hospital, when did that change occur?

Why was he signalling to some of the paparazzi before the crash? Where did he disappear to, before he left the hotel and why was so much money found on his body after the crash? Was he instructed to travel a particular way?

7. Who was on the mystery motorbike?
According to Brenda Wells, a British secretary driving in the tunnel at the time of the crash, she was near the tunnel entrance when a motorbike with two people came screaming along, just in front of a black Mercedes. She saw two flashes of light and heard the crash. A moment later a swarm of bikes entered the tunnel, stopped, and she heard someone exclaim: "It's Di!" Her story is confirmed by Francois Levistre, a harbour pilot, who had entered the tunnel ahead of the Mercedes. We do not know who was riding that motorbike, and the police have never found them. Why not?

The Mirror: Francois Levistre, 63, claimed a blinding "white flash" was directed at Diana's Mercedes from the men's motorbike after it overtook in the Pont d'Alma tunnel, Paris. Seconds later the Mercedes ploughed into a pillar. Asked why he did not leave his car to help, Mr Levistre told a London inquest: "Fear...I thought they were hitmen. We thought the two cyclists had come to kill the people in the car." It was also claimed the Mercedes may have bumped another car.

What happened in the mysterious death of a white Fiat's driver?
This is London
: But Mr Al Fayed's barrister Michael Mansfield QC suggested James Andanson may have been attacked before the car was set on fire. He said: "We just don't know whether it s a case of a man consigning himself to a bizarre and painful death or whether in fact some violence had been meted out to him first." Police are certain that Andanson, a millionaire, was a regular informer for both MI6, the British Secret Intelligence Service, and French agencies. But he was never properly interviewed by the authorities, and less than three years after the tragedy, he was also found dead. His body, found in thick woodland near Montpellier, was so badly charred that it took police nearly a month before DNA and dental records confirmed his identity.

Would you commit suicide this way?

Why did Burell condense his 3 hour "dark forces" conversation with the Queen about Dodi and Diana relationship down to one sentence?
The Sun: His friend said, Burrell had done a deal, Burrell said, "well, it is the Queen."

“I sacrificed my own integrity for the bigger picture. No I didn’t tell the whole truth. But he put me in the most unenviable position, that coroner. Because he said I had to report the conversation I had with the Queen.

“The conversation with the Queen was three hours long. And I wasn’t about to sit there and divulge everything she said to me. I wasn’t going do that. I said, ‘Do I have to answer that question?’ He said, ‘Yes, you do’. I said, ‘Well, she showed great concern’. That was all I was prepared to say.

He reported the Queen saying after Diana's death. ‘There are dark forces at work in this country about which we know little.’

The Queen, 'remembered' that Burrell was 'given' some of Diana's possessions. He had been accused of stealing them. And thus, his theft trail collapsed.
Diana letter
"I am sitting at my desk today longing for someone to hug me and encourage me to keep strong and hold my head high.
"This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous. My husband is planning an accident in my car, brake failure or some serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry Tiggy. Camilla is nothing more than a decoy so we are being used by the man in every sense of the word."

If you were that rich and powerful, would you take a wife as ugly as Camilla? Why would he do this? Because she knows the truth? Because she lets you get it off with young mini royals like Tiggy? Young man servants?

Remember, Burrell was going to reveal secrets that would shake the monarchy and bring it down.

Why did Condon and Stevens not hand over the note that Diana thought she'd be bumped off in a crash?

The Sun
: Mr Fayed also raised concerns about a message - dubbed the Mishcon note - written by Diana’s divorce lawyer Lord Mishcon after an October 1995 meeting outlining her fears that there was a plot to kill her in a car crash.

In the strictest of confidence Lord Mishcon passed it on to police following a meeting with the then Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Paul Condon after the Princess’s death.

It was only when Diana’s former butler, Paul Burrell, produced a note from the Princess making very similar allegations, while Sir John Stevens was head of the Met, that the police agreed to hand over the Mishcon note.

It was sent to the coroner in December 2003.

Reading from a statement, Mr Fayed said: “My belief that my son and Princess Diana were murdered was confirmed when I learned that the two leading Commissioners - Lord Condon and Lord Stevens - did not show the coroner the note made by a leading lawyer, Lord Mishcon, detailing the Princess’ fears for her life.”

He added: “I cannot believe that they sat upon such an important note and did not pass it on to the (examining French Magistrate) Judge Stephan in Paris and (the then coroner) Michael Burgess.

“I believe that they acted unprofessionally and they must have no conscience.”

The Harrods boss described the note as “devastating” and said it explained Diana’s fears in “black and white”.

Conclusion
To my mind, this inquest has been a farce, run by a compliant and not very inquisitive coroner. Remember this is the forth one! The rest wouldn't/couldn't toe the line.

Obviously, someone somewhere doctored Henri Paul's blood. Proof that someone somewhere knew it wasn't an accident and wanted someone in the frame. The others have contributed to the conspiracy. "It is the Queen." And they are mostly lords and knights.

It's been a farce because they just couldn't get to the truth, couldn't get the answers the establishment wanted.

I'd also like to see more investigation into the mis-information fed to the press immediately after the accident. The armour plating that delayed getting Diana out.  There was no armour plating.  The drunk driver story, he was not drunk, nor an alcoholic.

Who said she was rubbing her belly saying she was six month pregnant? Why did the two police motorcyclists lose the ambulance during the 70 minute, 4 mile, journey to the hospital? The missing witnesses--Brenda Wells? Why isn't there a detailed map of all the people there at the time, including the strange fireman. Why the accident site was cleansed so quickly?

Too much stinks.

blairOut:
# At 18/2/08; 8:32:28 PM
To the Blair Out dept.
Comment [0] Trackback [0]
Diana murder & inquest farce



 
February 2008
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
  1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29  
Jan   Mar